The European Court of Human Rights and its Theories of Interpreting the European Convention of Human Rights

AuthorMurzea, C.
PositionDepartment of Private Law, Transilvania University of Brasov
Pages141-148
Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov • Vol. 5 (54) No. 1 - 2012
Series VII: Social Sciences • Law
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN
RIGHTS AND ITS THEORIES OF
INTERPREPRETING THE EUROPEAN
CONVENTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Cristinel MURZEA1
Abstract: The European system of human rights protection is generally
considered as a model of the effectiveness at the level of the i nternational
human right law. This general opinion expressed in the doctrine is mainly
due to the current mechanism of protection of the rights guaranteed by the
European Convention of Human Rights that enables an unique and
permanent body, namely the European Court of Human Rights, to exercise
an effective control upon the violations of the convention made by the
Member States. Still, the doctrine is not very open to the interpretations of
the ECtHR. In the following we shall present the main theories reflected in
the ECtHR case-law as well the criticism formulated by the doctrine.
Key words: European Convention of Human Rights, European Court of
Human Rights, theory, interpretation.
1 Department of Private Law, Transilvania University of Braşov.
1. Introduction
The ECHR was drafted within the
Council of Europe, a political organization
founded in the aftermath of the Second
World War in order t o defend democracy,
the rule of law, and human rights in
Europe. The Convention opened for
signature in Rome on 4 November 1950
and entered into force in September 1953.
Since 1998, due to the reform of the
system by t he Protocol No. 11, the
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
has had exclusive jurisdiction to receive
individual applications. The recognition of
the right to individual application before
the Court is compulsory for all Member
States and the judgments of ECtHR are
binding, a reason for which the European
system the human rights protection is
considered a model of effectiveness in the
international order of human rights law [2].
The effectiveness of the European
Convention of Human Rights is manifested
in many ways, both in the effect it has had
on the domestic law and in the increasing
number of applications being lodged
before ECtHR that has generated a rich
and extensive human rights case law,
unique in international law.
Still, the effectiveness of the European
system has been under threat from two
directions. First, the Court became a
“victim” of its own success [6], having
difficulties in managing the ever-
increasing caseload. This has partly to do
with the increased awareness of the right to
individual application within Contracting

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT