The Reorganization Law in Poland

AuthorRafal Adamus
PositionProfessor, Ph.D., Faculty of Law, Opole University, Poland
Pages101-120
Abstract: The
aim of this p
reorganization law. This is a
Bankruptcy and Reorganizati
the main sou rce of law in th
Chapter 11 of the Bankrup
reorganization proceedings i
that the l
egislative experime
Reorganization Law is a v
proceedings seriously differ f
Keywords:
reorganization pr
1. Introduction
Bankruptcy in Poland s
insolvent (art. 10 b.r.l.)
is determined likely th
satisfied to a higher d
bankruptcy proceeding
bankru
ptcy with the p
declared by the bankru
declaring bankruptcy w
court shall declare bank
1
Professor, Ph.D., Faculty
+4021.330.86.06. Correspon
2
See also (Kruczalak-
Jank
Merczyski & Trocki,
2011,

Rafał ADAMUS
1
is paper is to present general remarks of the legal structure
s a
completely new institution in Poland. The Act of 28 Febru
zation Law
(J.L. No 60, item 535 as amended)
, the articles 492
the
commented matter. The idea of the Polish regulation d e
r
ruptcy Code of the United States. The statistics of the
s in Poland are not very impressive. In this respect some cri
ment
called “reorganiza
tion proceedings” is unsuccessful. Nev
very important figure in the Polish commercial law. Re
er from bankruptcy proceedings
proceedings;
entrepreneur, bankruptcy
d shall be declared with respect to a debtor who h
.l.)
(Kowalewski & Kwasnicki, 2007, p. 1136).
2
As
that under an bankruptcy arrangement the credito
degree than they would have been satisfied as
ings comprising the liquidation of the debto
possibility to make an bankruptcy arrangemen
kruptcy court (art. 14 b.r.l.). But if there are no g
with the possibility to make an arrangement the
nk
ruptcy by liquidation of the debtor’s assets (art. 1
lty of Law, Op ole Universi
ty, Poland
, Phone: +4021.330
onding author: radamus@uni.opole.pl
.
ankowska,
2007, p. 6; Petraniuk, 2003, p. 17;
Pannert,
1,
p. 99. AUDJ, Vol
. 8, no. 1
JURIDICA
101
Poland

re of the Polish
bruary 2003 the
92
- 521 b.r.l. is
rives from th e
e usage o f the
critics maintain
Nevertheless the
Reorganization
o has become
As a rule if it
ditors will be
as a result of
btor’s assets,
ent shall be
o grounds for
e bankruptcy
t. 15 b.r.l.).
330.88.64; Fax:
t,
2004, p. 16;
. 1
, pp. 101-120
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS DANUBIUS Vol. 8, no. 1/2012
102
Spiritus movens of reorganization proceedings is the entrepreneur. The
entrepreneur decides whether to start reorganization proceedings. The position of
the bankruptcy court in the proceedings is reduced to minimum. The bankruptcy
court has authorization in the matter of the opening of the reorganization
proceedings, appointing a court supervisor, approval of the arrangement
(settlement), revocation of the arrangement. The entrepreneur prepares by himself
the reorganization plan, restructuring proposals for the arrangement with creditors,
the list of claims. The reorganization arrangement should be adopted in a very short
period of time (three or four months) and if the entrepreneur fails to make the
arrangement in the prescribed period of time the proceedings shall be discontinued
by virtue of law. The Reorganization Law provides moratorium for the payment of
the entrepreneur’s debts.
It should be clearly explained that the Act contains both material and procedural
(formal) rules. The regulation of the Reorganization Law is not complex. Within
the scope not regulated in the provisions of the Reorganization Law proper rules of
the Bankruptcy Law shall apply accordingly to the reorganization proceedings.
There is a couple of references to the Bankruptcy Law (for example art. 493 b.r.l.).
In some matters the Bankruptcy Law contains a reference to the Code of Civil
Proceedings.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency
proceedings shall apply to collective insolvency proceedings which entail the
partial or total divestment of a debtor and the appointment of a liquidator (art. 1
sec. 1 reg. 1346/2000) (Zedler et al., 2011).
1
For the purposes of the Regulation No
1346/2000 ‘insolvency proceedings’ shall mean the collective proceedings referred
to in Article 1 sec.1. These proceedings are listed in Annex A and ‘liquidator’ shall
mean any person or body whose function is to administer or liquidate assets of
which the debtor has been divested or to supervise the administrations of his
affairs. Those persons and bodies are listed in Annex C. The reorganization
proceedings (“postpowanie naprawcze”) are not listed in Annex A. (Adamus,
2009, p. 76) Because of a couple of reasons it is a mistake. Similar proceedings, for
example company voluntary arrangement, are listed in Annex A.
1
See also: (Klyta, 2008; Szydlo, 2009; Chilarski, 2009; Armatowska, 2011; Hrycaj, 2011; Jakubecki,
2005; Glicz, 2003; Gurgul, 2009; Grzejszczak & Chilarski, 2004; Adamus, 2004)

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT