Punitive Damages and the Extent of its Application in the Iraqi and Romanian Competition Laws

AuthorAl Jashami Muhammed Khariy Qsair
ProfessionFaculty of Law, University of Bucharest
Pages19-26
Punitive Damages and the Extent of its Application in the Iraqi and
Romanian Competition Laws
PhD. student Al Jashami Muhammed Khariy QSAIR
1
Abstract
Punitive damages continue to take a large part of the jurisprudential debate be-
tween law scholars between supp orters and opponents for reasons of constitutionality.
This research is an attempt to determine the possibility of applying punitive damages in
competition laws. The researcher adopts the method of analyzing and comparing legal
texts. The results of the study highlight the importance of punitive damages in competition
laws.
Keywords: punitive damages; competition law; fines; consumer.
JEL Classification: K22
1. Introduction
Punitive damages serve dual purposes of retribution and deterrence. In
an attempt to “compensate” the injured person for the loss suffered. Where a de-
fendant has engaged in particularly egregious conduct, however, punitive dam-
ages can be awarded in addition to compensatory damages. A punitive damages
award will generally exceed the actual value of the harm caused by the defendant.
Although the permissible motivations behind awarding punitive damages are
somewhat unsettled, it is generally accepted that punitive damages serve the dual
purposes of deterrence and retribution, for instance, there is some doubt about the
compensatory rationale of punitive damages, explaining that today punitive dam-
ages should be understood as “quasi-criminal” “private fines” designed to punish
and deter the misconduct at issue. The purpose of competition laws in the world
is to prevent and punish acts against legitimate competition and to prevent the
bad intention of monopolizing the market by means of fraud. It works to protect
the interests of consumers, which clearly shows the need to deal with any kind of
seriousness with any violation of consumer rights and protect it from fraud or
deception by the creators Employers seem to think the idea of punitive damages
is the most effective way to achieve the objectives of the competition law, but the
handling of national legislation does not refer to this position clearly.
1
Al Jashami Muhammed Khariy Qsair, Faculty of Law, University of Bucharest; Le cturer in Col-
lege of Law, Thi Qar University, Iraq, legalur@yahoo.com

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT