Theoretical and Practical Considerations Regarding the Child?s Right to a Family Environment and to Alternative Care

Author:Aurelian Gherghe
Position:Ecologic University in Bucharest, Law Faculty
Pages:414-419
 
FREE EXCERPT
Theoretical and Practical Considerations Regarding the Child’s Right to a
Family Environment and to Alternative Care
Aurelian Gherghe1
1Ecologic University in Bucharest, Law Faculty
1 Preliminary considerations
Child protection represents the set of rights and duties acknowledged in the child’s interest, to his/her
natural or foster parents, whose exercise, and fulfilment, respectively, has as purpose the insurance of
the child’s raising, education and formation for life1.
The legal framework with respect to the protection of the minor, observance, promotion and granting
of the child’s rights is established by the Family Code and by Law no. 272/2004 related to the
protection and promotion of the child’s rights2.
The underage child’s protection is mainly and habitually done by the parents. The exercise of rights
and the fulfilment of the parental duties must have in mind the superior interest of the child and ensure
the child’s material and spiritual well being, especially by taking care of him/her, by maintaining
personal relations with him/her, by ensuring his/her raising, education and maintenance, as well as by
his/her regal representation and by the management of his/her patrimony. In this sense, art. 5
paragraph (2) of Law no. 272/2004 stipulates that the responsibility for the bringing up and insurance
of the child development devolves mainly upon the parents, who must exert their rights and fulfil their
obligations towards the child, taking into account, first of all, his/her highest interest.
In the child’s rights matter, the dominant principle is that of complying with and promoting with
priority the superior interest of the child. This principle is imposed including in relation with the rights
and obligations of the child’s parents, of his/her ot her legal representatives, and to any persons to
whom he/she was legally entrusted3. T he judicial practice and the specialized l iterature have
emphasized the prevalence of the principle of the child’s superior interest in all steps and decisions
regarding the children, taken by public authorities and authorized private bodies, as well as in the
cases solved by courts of law.
The defence system around the child is concentric: the natural and legal core is the family, formed of
parents and their children; the extended family, composed of the child, parents and their relatives 4th
1 In this sense, see: A. Ionaşcu, M.N. Costin, M. Mureşan, V . Ursa „Filiaţia şi ocrotirea minorilor”, Dacia Publishing
House, Cluj-Napoca, 1980, p. 172.
2 Published in the Official Gazette, Part I, no. 557 of the 23rd of Jun e 2004. This law came into force on the 1st of January
2005, except for th e provisions of art. 17 paragraph (2), art. 19 p aragraph. (3), art. 84 paragraph. (2), art. 104 paragraph (2),
art. 105 paragraph (5), art. 107 paragraph (2) and art. 117- which came into force 3 days after the publishing of this law in the
Official Gazette, Part I.
3 Thus, it was decided that th e protection of a child who claims to have been the vi ctim of a physical and/or emotional abuse,
especially when he/she comes from a family with social problems, i.e. the separation of parents, after one of them decided to
work abroad, must be realized promptly, with the identification o f the members of the extended family, capable of exerting
„de facto” the parental rights and also by listening to what the underage child’s statement, to the extent allowed by his/her
situation and age. (Bucharest Court of Law, 5th Civil Section, civil judgment no. 888 from August 1st 2006, irrevocable b y
lack of appeal, unpublished.
414

To continue reading

REQUEST YOUR TRIAL