Reasons Concerning the Restriction of Some Rights in Compliance With the Provisions of art. 53 of the Romanian Constitution
Author | Marius Andreescu - Andra Puran |
Position | University of Pitesti, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Law |
Pages | 71-80 |
Law, Society & Organisations
Volume V, Issue 9 (2 / 2020)
71
Marius ANDREESCU
Judge at Court of Appeal Piteşti;
University of Pitesti, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Law
Andra PURAN
University of Pitesti, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Law
REASONS CONCERNING THE
RESTRICTION OF SOME RIGHTS IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS
OF ART. 53 OF THE ROMANIAN
CONSTITUTION
K
eywords
State law;
Fundamental rights and liberties;
Restriction of the exercise of the fundamental rights;
Principle of proportionality;
Constitutional requirements;
Abstract
An essential dimension of the rule of law is the consecration and guarantee of fundamental rights and
freedoms, ensuring the optimal conditions for applying them. State authorities have a negative obligation
to refrain from any arbitrary or excessive interference that may limit or condition the exercise of
constitutional rights. Any restriction on applying fundamental rights and freedom s by measures ordered by
the state authorities must be exceptional and must comply with the conditions imposed by the Constitution
but also by the relevant international legal instruments. Based on these premises, this study analyzes the
constitutional institution of restricting the exercise of certain rights. It also looks into the main
particularities of the principle of proportionality applied when restricting the exercise of certain rights, with
references to the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights.
To continue reading
Request your trial