Perspectives on Globalization - Aspects of Cultural Diversity, Integrating Practices and Events
Author | Ruxandra Coman, Anita Grigoriu |
Position | Spiru Haret University of Bucharest, Faculty of Journalism, Communication and Public Relations |
Pages | 708-712 |
European Integration -
Realities
708
Perspectives
on Globali
Co
¹Spiru Haret University of Bu
Rela
²
Spiru Haret University of Bu
Abstract: This paper aims at
pr
phenomenon of globalization
, fo
of the phenomenon itself,
pro
globalization is perceived
in th
nation, from the democratic poi
new status of being an
Europea
other persons interested in
the as
Keywords: cultural integrity;
int
1. Introduction
Most of the researchers who hav
task of illuminating and not pros
understood, and not accepted ta
disadvantages. “The goal is to i
introduction of the work „Global
dramatic chang
e in „the shape of
millennium. The classical theor
Village” are surpassed in the
phenomenon of globalization, se
different perspectives, with a spec
2. The Latest Points o
f View
If in a previous work James H.
2000)
pointing out that globaliza
transformations and resistance to
signal by the offensive interro
es and Perspectives
alization
- Aspects o
f Cultural Diversit
Practices and Events
Coman R
uxandra¹, Grigoriu Anita²
f Bucharest, Faculty of Journalism, Communication
elations, ruxandrazcoman@yahoo.com
f Bucharest, Faculty of Journalism, Communication
Relations, anitzavn@yahoo.com
present
ing the various views of the experts and
researchers
focusing
on cultural diversity. Also the study contributes to
providing
a responsible and open approach.
Our contrib
the Romanian society and
answer the questions about
the a
oint of view,
such as Romania, to face the challenges
comin
ean
Union member state. It is addressing to students,
teache
aspects that the phenomenon of globalization implies.
intercultural communication
; collective mindset;
cultural value
ave approached the theme of globalization claim
roselytising, in the sense that this significant issue
tacitly without the discer
nment needed to evalu
o illuminate, not prozelityze”
(Weinstein, 2005
, p
balization
–
What’s New”, which, in 2005 already
of globalization”
(Weinstein, 2005, p. 2)
at the be
eories of Canadian McLuhan, with the famous
e latest years by the critical studies of those
seen in all its contradictory complexity, analyzed
pecial focus on the issues involved by cultural diver
w
about Globalization Phenomenon
H. Mittleman spoke about „The globalization syn
ization and Americanization are not the same and
to global cohesion,
in a later study the same aut
rrogation full of connotations:
“
who governs
2011
sity, Integrating
ion and Public
ion and Public
ers who
stu died the
the understanding
tribute
shows how
e ability of a
young
ming
along with the
chers
, and to all the
lues
m to have assumed the
sue needs to be deeply
aluate advantages and
, p. 1)
, is stated in the
dy raised the issue of a
beginning of the third
us phrase “the Global
e w
ho researched the
ed and discussed from
verty.
syndrome”
(Mittelman,
d went deeper into the
author pulled an alarm
s globalization?”. For
To continue reading
Request your trial