On the dissolution of the limited liability company. Disagreement of the shareholders

AuthorCristina Cojocaru
PositionDepartment of Law, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania, cristina.cojocaru@cig.ase.ro.
Pages104-110
On the dissolution of the limited liability company.
Disagreement of the shareholders
Lecturer Cristina COJOCARU1
Abstract
The limited liability co mpany, similar to the general par tnership is set up and
functions on the grounds of the trust b etween shar eholders. Therefore, this type of company
has an intuitu personae character , just like any company of persons. The limited liability
company opera tes as long as the conditions laid down by la w ar e met, and if a ny or more
causes leading to the improper opera tion of the company, it shall dissolve. One of the
dissolution cases is that stipulated by articles 227 pa ragraph (1) letter e) of Law no. 31/1990
the dissolution by court decision respectively when the dissolution cannot be decided
following a decision of the genera l meeting on solid grounds, which can be
misunderstandings between the shareholder s. Such misunderstandings are not by themselves
enough to lead to dissolution, but it is necessary for them to determine the improper operation
or lack of any company’s operation.
Keywords: limited liability company, the Romania n Law, dissolution, affectio societatis.
JEL Classification: K22
1. Introduction
A relatively recent case2 in our Supreme Court gives us the opportunity to
analyse some legal provisions on the dissolution of commercial companies in general
and especially of limited liability companies, a type of company that is very common
in our law. In the present case, some of the shareholders have requested the court to
order the dissolution of the company because there were severe, irreconcilable
disagreements between the shareholders, based on the provisions of art. 227 par. (1)
letter e) of Law no. 31/1990 (hereinafter, "the Law" or "Law no. 31/1990").
The cessation of the existence of the company results in the termination of
its legal personality and the liquidation of its patrimony. This activity requires as a
general rule two distinct and successive phases: the dissolution phase of the
company followed by the liquidation phase, when its patrimony is liquidated.
Dissolution is therefore the first stage of the process of cessation of a company's
existence3 creating the premises for its liquidation.
According to the legal provisions, the decision to dissolve the company is
made by the General Meeting or by the court, and only exceptionally, it is carried
out exclusively based on the provisions of the law. It is worth mentioning that the
1 Cristina Cojocaru Department of Law, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania,
cristina.cojocaru@cig.ase.ro.
2 See Decision no. 679/27 February 2015 of ICCJ, Second Civil Division.
3 Stanciu D. Carpenaru, Trata t de drept comercial roman, conform noului Cod civil, Universul Juridic
Publishing House, Bucharest, 2012, p. 263 et seq.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT